
| home | forum | features | reviews | interviews | events | best-of | links | gallery | whoweare |
|
criticaldance.com ballet and modern dance forum
![]() UK performance
![]() Wayne McGregor and the Royal Ballet
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Wayne McGregor and the Royal Ballet |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
'Symbiont(s)' with Deborah Bull and Edward Watson
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,62-115556,00.html IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
The legs have it in Wayne's world By Jann Parry in The Observer
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
The 'Duo:logue' programme has been very well received and has been a good 'bringing together' for ballet and modern fans as well as for the dancers. When I went on Friday, Tony Hall the new ROH Executive Director was there. So fingers crossed that he has latched on to the ADI concept. 'Symbiont(s)' was as exciting as the first time I saw it with the dancers going hell for leather. Apart from those mentioned by Jann Parry above, Tom Sapsford made a big impression on a lot of people. Hopefully the Royal will make better use of him next season. 'Aeon' to wonderful string ensemble music by Marin Marais is all elegance and McGregor's Random Dance perform it with great skill. In a series of solos and conversations between the dancers, the troubled relationships that stand out for their variety. The ensemble pieces were very strong and Claire Cunningham and Laila Dialio excelled in their solos. 'brainstate' brought up to 18 dancers from both companies onto the Linbury stage. It kept my attention and some thought it the high-spot of the evening. However, it didn't leave as clear an image with me as the highly focussed earlier works. This programme goes for one night to The Maltings, Snape and then to Washington alongside the Royal Ballet visit. IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
Duo:Logue By Judith Mackrell in The Guardian
quote:
quote: Stuart adds: An unfortunate turn of phrase above, even if 'slumming it' is in inverted commas. 'Symbiont(s)' is generally seen one of the best new works by the Royal Ballet for several years. So substitute 'doing high quality new work'. [This message has been edited by Stuart Sweeney (edited April 23, 2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
Wayne's world sets a standard Jenny Gilbert in The Independent reviews Wayne McGregor's 'Duo:logue' and also the 'Junebug Symphony'. http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/theatre/ Creature of fantasy leaps from the dark Ismene Brown reviews Duo:Logue by the Royal Ballet and Random, at Covent Garden [This message has been edited by Stuart Sweeney (edited April 24, 2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
Random, RB + Storm - Up in the air tonight Wayne McGregor experiments effectively with ballet in Duo:logue, while circus skills add nothing to Storm, says David Dougill in The Sunday Times IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
Ballet's Next Step? By Lisa Traiger for The Washington Post
quote: Shame it's so short. IP: Logged |
|
Emma Pegler Moderator |
Reading Stuart's very well thought-out article in June's Dance Europe, "Hierarchies - so we need them?", I would like to develop one thread of the argument, that we get to see the dancers who are not principals and who are not in the upper echelons of the Royal Ballet performing new works and only then are we aware of their capablilities - ie there is a rigid hierarchy of certain roles for certain status which is apparently quite inflexible unless one of the leads is injured and then one of the juniors gets their chance. Wayne McGregor's work with the Royal Ballet really gave some of the less visible dancers an opportunity to shine and what has been happening in the Clore, and by extension, in the Linbury, has not only helped new choreographers and dancers from worlds other than ballet to get air play, but has also raised awareness of the general talent of some of the less visisble dancers that we see in roles on the big stage that do not allow them to give all they have. Ed Watson is an obvious example - he became quite the darling of the newspaper critics after working with McGregor. Another thread is that principals are often under-utilised because they have only a choice of the big roles and, let's face it, there are a large number of principals who cannot all be on the stage at the same time. Deborah Bull, principal for many years, was able to show herself in work emminently suited to her style and in which she shone, and what a huge shame if we had never seen her dance like that - absolutely one of the highest quality and most energising performances I had seen in a long time. (I am talking about the first performance Royal Ballet/McGregor in the Clore Studio). I thought at the time, dance doesn't get much better than this. IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
I guess that we were able to see Deborah Bull in RB performances by Forsythe whom she reveres. However, one point is that the Royal does not perform as much work in that category as Continental companies do and this has not played to one of Deborah Bull's strengths. This might well change under the more adventurous Stretton, but not everyone will cheer. Regarding the younger dancers who shone so brightly in Duo:logue, I really have my fingers crossed that the RB gives proper weighting to performances in The Clore and the Linbury as well as the main auditorium. Thanks for the compliment Emma. It was the hierarchies topic in 'Issues' that lead to the article. [This message has been edited by Stuart Sweeney (edited May 26, 2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Stuart Sweeney Administrator |
'Duo:logue': A Shared Language By Lisa Traiger for The Washington Post
quote: IP: Logged |
All times are PT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39c
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.